|
Public Relations > News: Contract Negotiations > Fund Balance Can't
Be Used to Pay for
Teacher Contract
Fund Balance Can't
Be Used to Pay for
Teacher Contract
The SAEA has suggested that
the district will be able to pay for
its proposed salary increases by
tapping into the fund balance.
The Souderton Area School
Board is reserving this money
for the following purposes:
Capital projects - Capital
projects are facility improvements
that are one-time
expenses. Using the fund
balance for projects like these
means the district, in some cases,
is able to avoid raising taxes for
such expenditures.
Anticipated PSERS
expenses - In three years,
the district will be required by
the state to pay a substantially
higher contribution rate for the
Pennsylvania State Employee
Retirement System (PSERS).
The district has been setting
money aside to soften the impact
that this increase will have on
the budget in the future.
Unexpected costs — Just as any family sets aside
a portion of their income for emergencies, the school
district reserves a portion of its budget for
unanticipated items.
Associated high school costs —
Though construction costs for the new high school
are being paid through
a bond, when the school opens the district will need to
pay for items such as furniture and other “soft costs”
associated with a new building.
In effect, the fund balance is used for one-time
expenses or to offset the impact of large budgetary
increases in certain years. Using the fund balance to
pay for an ongoing expense, such as teacher salaries,
would be fiscally irresponsible. It would be like using
one’s savings to pay for a monthly bill—eventually
the money in the savings runs out and the payment
has to come from some other source. Once the fund
balance is spent, the district would have to find a way
to replenish it and to continue paying for its contractual
obligations. This would likely lead to a large tax
increase and possible cuts to programs and staff.
|